As 2025 draws to a close, it is increasingly clear that this has been a year of transition, marked by overlapping crises, geopolitical uncertainty and structural shifts in the global economy. Climate, trade, finance and industrial policy have become inseparable from power dynamics and international relations. This complex backdrop is clearly reflected in the reading choices of Renewable Matter’s audience, which in 2025 gravitated toward in-depth analyses of global fractures, regulatory conflicts and the environmental consequences of political decisions.
The most read article of the year focused on the BRICS bloc and the growing tensions around international carbon markets. By examining the dilemma between mutual recognition of carbon credits and the implementation of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, the piece highlighted how emerging economies are seeking greater autonomy in climate governance. The article captured readers’ attention by showing that climate cooperation is no longer just a technical matter, but a strategic arena where geopolitical influence and economic competitiveness collide.
From there, the focus shifted to the erosion of long-standing global narratives, starting with the idea of American exceptionalism. An analysis of the United States’ declining geopolitical dominance resonated strongly with readers, linking domestic polarization, fiscal constraints and climate policy paralysis to a broader rebalancing of global power. This theme of systemic change continued with coverage of water geopolitics, notably the dispute between India and Bangladesh over the Teesta River. That article framed water scarcity as a growing source of international legal conflict, underscoring how climate stress is amplifying regional tensions in South Asia.
Environmental accountability within Europe also ranked high among readers’ interests. The extensive coverage of the Miteni PFAS trial in Italy, which resulted in historic convictions of former executives, was one of the most read stories of the year. The article detailed the legal, health and environmental implications of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination, positioning the ruling as a potential precedent for corporate environmental liability across the EU.
Several highly read articles explored the transatlantic clash over sustainability regulation. One investigation examined how the United States has increasingly framed European ESG directives as a threat to American economic interests, warning of potential trade retaliation. This narrative was reinforced by coverage of US decisions to block stricter limits on PFAS in industrial wastewater, revealing a regulatory rollback that contrasts sharply with Europe’s precautionary approach. Together, these stories painted a picture of diverging environmental standards and growing regulatory friction between major economies.
Climate finance emerged as another central theme. Readers showed strong interest in the decision by major US banks to exit the Net Zero Banking Alliance, a move interpreted as a signal of political pressure and uncertainty around climate commitments. The article connected financial sector retrenchment to broader debates on the credibility of voluntary climate initiatives and the risks of greenwashing in a fragmented regulatory landscape.
Resource competition also featured prominently, with an analysis of why the United States is increasingly interested in Ukraine’s rare earth resources, linking critical minerals, energy security and geopolitical leverage in the context of ongoing conflict.
Trade policy and environmental regulation intersected in coverage of the EU’s decision to delay the Mercosur agreement amid farmers’ protests. That article showed how domestic political pressures, environmental standards and global trade negotiations are becoming ever more entangled. A similar regulatory tension emerged in discussions around the EU Deforestation Regulation, where the timber supply chain called for postponement and revision, highlighting the operational challenges of implementing ambitious sustainability rules.
Beyond geopolitics and markets, Renewable Matter’s audience also engaged with ethical and environmental debates. An in-depth examination of animal testing questioned whether it remains a necessary practice in light of scientific advances, while an investigation into land subsidence in Tehran revealed the hidden environmental costs of water mismanagement, linking urban planning failures to climate vulnerability.
Taken together, the most read articles of 2025 reveal a readership deeply interested in the intersections between environment, power and economics. Rather than isolated environmental stories, readers favored analyses that connected climate and sustainability to global systems, legal frameworks and geopolitical shifts. As Renewable Matter looks ahead to 2026, it will continue to follow international affairs with the same critical lens, exploring how environmental challenges both shape and are shaped by a rapidly changing world.
Cover: Envato image